Orchid Periodontics & Dental Implants

3 Approaches to Placing Implants After Tooth Extractions

Losing a tooth can be stressful, especially when it happens suddenly due to pain, decay, or trauma. Beyond the cosmetic effects, a space in your smile can lead to bone loss in the jaw, cause nearby teeth to shift, and make chewing more difficult. Dental implants are the most reliable way to permanently replace missing teeth, but when the implant is placed after an extraction, the timing and method of insertion are both crucial.

At Orchid Periodontics & Dental Implants, Dr. Javadi carefully evaluates each case to determine the most effective approach. The three scheduling strategies include: 

  • Immediate implant placement
  • Delayed implant placement 
  • Bone grafting first, implant later 

Understanding these approaches will help you ask informed questions, manage your expectations, and choose the plan that best supports your long-term oral health.

Approach 1: Immediate Implant Placement

Immediate placement means the surgeon extracts the tooth and places a titanium implant post into the socket in a single visit. A temporary crown or healing cap is attached that same day. After the bone fuses to the implant, which is called osseointegration, a permanent crown replaces the temporary one.

Key Benefits:

  • Shorter overall treatment time: You skip the separate waiting period, moving more quickly from extraction to final crown.  
  • Fewer surgical visits: Combining two procedures into one means less time off work, and lower total surgical fees.  
  • Better bone preservation: The implant post immediately takes the place of the extraction socket, signaling the body to maintain bone density that would otherwise start to shrink within weeks.  
  • Improved gum contours for front teeth: Immediate placement can help maintain the natural “papilla” (gum peaks between teeth), resulting in a more lifelike final result in the smile zone.  

Possible Downsides:

  • Primary stability must be achievable: The socket walls need enough height and thickness for the implant to be tightened securely at surgery. Thin or damaged bone may rule out this option.  
  • Existing infection: If the extraction site is infected (for example, an abscessed molar), the surgeon may prefer a staged approach to avoid trapping bacteria around the implant.  
  • Higher risk of early implant failure (though still low): Since healing and osseointegration happen at the same time, perfect oral hygiene is essential. Smokers, heavy tooth grinders, and patients with uncontrolled diabetes may need to choose a delayed option.

Considerations:

  • Requires excellent bone quality and socket stability at the time of extraction.
  • Not recommended if active infection is present at the site.
  • Ideal for patients with strong oral hygiene and no major health complications.
  • May not be suitable for heavy smokers or patients with uncontrolled diabetes.

Approach 2: Delayed Implant Placement  

After extracting the tooth, the surgeon allows the socket to heal for a specific period, usually 8-12 weeks, and sometimes up to six months, depending on the case. During this time, soft tissue covers the site, and initial bone remodeling takes place. Once the site is free of infection and the bone has regained density, the implant is placed in a second procedure.

Early vs. conventional Delay: 

Early placement occurs after 4-8 weeks, when soft tissue has healed but bone is still remodeling. Conventional (late) placement happens after three or more months. Dr. Javadi will choose the timing that balances bone volume, infection control, and aesthetic requirements.

Key Benefits:

  • Reduced infection risk: Any remaining bacteria from the extraction are cleared, lowering the chance of post-surgical complications.  
  • Improved soft-tissue management: The gum tissue can be shaped more predictably, which is especially helpful in visible areas.  
  • Easier socket evaluation: After healing, the provider can accurately assess bone thickness and plan for minor grafts before drilling if needed.  
  • Higher primary stability: The healing bone is denser than a fresh socket, so the implant often achieves a stronger initial mechanical lock.  

Possible Downsides:

  • Longer overall timeline: You will wear a temporary partial denture for several weeks before the implant stage begins.  
  • Additional appointment: Two separate surgeries mean two recovery periods, although the second is usually less intense.  
  • Continued bone resorption: Some bone and gum shrinkage is likely while you wait, which may still require minor grafting.  
  • Temporary aesthetics: Removable temporaries can be bulkier and less stable than an immediate fixed provisional crown.  

Considerations:

  • Extends the overall treatment timeline compared to immediate placement.
  • Healing time allows better planning and assessment of bone quality.
  • Temporary prosthetics (like flippers or partial dentures) are often needed.
  • A good option for patients with infection, tissue trauma, or systemic concerns.
  • May still require minor bone grafting if resorption occurs during healing.

Approach 3: Bone Grafting Before Implant Placement  

Bone grafting adds to or enlarges the jawbone in areas where it is too thin or short to support an implant. The graft material can be:  

  • Autograft: your own bone, often from the chin or hip.  
  • Allograft: donor bone that has been processed and sterilized.  
  • Xenograft: bovine (cow) or porcine (pig) mineral matrix.  
  • Alloplast: synthetic calcium phosphate or bio-glass.  

The graft is packed into the socket or onto the ridge and is covered with a protective membrane. Over several months, your body gradually replaces the graft with living bone.  

Key Benefits:

  • Ensures implant stability: A wider, taller ridge allows the dentist to place a longer implant post, which distributes bite forces more safely.  
  • Improves implant survival rates: Studies show that implants have a higher long-term success rate when they are completely surrounded by healthy bone.  
  • Supports gum contours: Adequate bone volume acts like a framework under the gum, preventing “collapsed” soft tissue that can create food traps or dark gaps.  
  • Future-proofs the site: If you ever need a replacement crown or want to upgrade to a wider implant, having strong bone makes options available.  

Possible Downsides:

While bone grafting is a safe and common procedure that significantly improves implant outcomes, there are some potential drawbacks that patients should consider:

  • Extended treatment timeline: Bone grafting adds several months to the overall treatment plan. The grafted area typically needs 3–6 months to heal and integrate with your natural bone before an implant can be placed.
  • Additional surgical procedure: Bone grafting is a separate minor surgery, which means one more appointment, recovery period, and potential for post-operative discomfort.
  • Increased cost: As it involves extra materials and clinical steps, bone grafting may increase the total cost of your dental implant treatment. Insurance coverage can vary depending on the plan.
  • Risk of infection or graft failure: Although rare, there is a small risk that the grafted bone may not fully integrate or could become infected. In such cases, additional treatment may be required.
  • Post-surgical swelling or discomfort: As with any oral surgery, temporary swelling, bruising, or soreness is common after a bone graft. Most symptoms resolve within a few days and are manageable with over-the-counter medications.

Considerations:

  • Adds 3–6 months of healing time before implant placement.
  • Involves an additional surgical procedure with a separate recovery.
  • May include higher cost due to graft material and surgical planning.
  • Patients may have preferences about graft sources (self, donor, synthetic).
  • Excellent oral hygiene is critical to prevent infection and ensure success.
  • If using your own bone, donor site discomfort and healing should be expected.

Conclusion  

There is no one-size-fits-all timeline for dental implants after an extraction. 

Immediate placement offers speed and convenience when the socket is healthy and the surgeon can secure the implant firmly. 

Delayed placement gives tissues time to heal and mature, reducing infection risk and aiding aesthetics—ideal for complicated sites or when medical factors require caution. 

Grafting first, followed by implant placement, is the best approach when there isn’t enough bone volume, giving you a better chance for a solid, long-lasting implant. 

The right choice depends on your bone structure, oral health, medical history, aesthetic goals, and personal schedule. Only a qualified implant dentist can weigh these factors, evaluate 3-D scans, and create a detailed plan that fits your needs.

Ready to take the next step?  

Call us at (425) 775-2002 to speak with a patient coordinator and schedule an appointment.  

Don’t let tooth pain or missing teeth hold you back. Discover which implant approach offers the fastest, safest path to a confident smile; it all starts with a simple click or phone call today.

Dr Javadi
About the Author
Dr. Javadi is a skilled periodontist dedicated to restoring oral health and confident smiles.
Scroll to Top